by Arlan Weight (Bismarck, North Dakota) |
---|
Just where is the church today? It has been only 15 short years since the death of Herbert W. Armstrong and how many splits and factions are there? Oh sure, some folks split off from the Worldwide Church of God prior to 1986, but that was miniscule compared to today. But why all the groups? What is it that makes us split up? And why all the Armstrong bashing? It seems as though the church is in a confused state. Was Herbert Armstrong a false prophet? All these questions and more deserve an answer. If we are ever to make any sense of things in the church today, we must get to the bottom of it all. To this writer the answer is somewhat simple, and yet at the same time profound. The reason the church is scattered today appears to be the same reason it became scattered after the death of Paul, and the other apostles. It seems as though history repeats itself. The New Testament church began on Pentecost 31 AD. The last apostle to die was John, which may have been somewhere at the turn of the century. The scattering of the church began a bit earlier, but about the same time of John’s death the church seems hidden from view and does not appear until much later. According to many Bible scholars, when the church reappeared, it looked quite different from what the apostles started out with. This modern era of the church began about 1900 years later or somewhere about 1931. Herbert W. Armstrong died in January of 1986 and here we are at the turn of the century again. Can we see some similarities between the original church of 31 AD and that of our time today? Where is the visible church? Is there any one of the so called ‘Church of God’ groups that is dominantly the true Church of God… the one Jesus said he would build? (Mat. 16:18) Of course, we can’t know all the details of what happened in 100 A.D., but if present conditions are any hint of the past, we can see many people began separating and splitting off, just like today. But what caused the splits back then? Does the Bible offer any clues? Let us take a look. Paul gives one clue when he says, “I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:” (Gal. 1:6) Paul could see this sort of thing beginning to happen to the Galatians. But also, he told the Ephesian church elders (Acts 20:17) what was to befall them after he was gone. “For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock. Also, of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them.” (Acts 20:29-30) So, in Galatians Paul indicated they were beginning to be fed with another gospel. What was the gospel that Paul preached? “And now, behold, I know that ye all, among whom I have gone preaching the kingdom of God, shall see my face no more.” (Acts 20:25) When Paul was nearing the end of his life in Rome, he was still preaching the same message… that of the kingdom of God. Notice Acts 28:23. “And when they had appointed him a day, there came many to him into his lodging to whom he expounded and testified ‘the kingdom of God, persuading them concerning Jesus, both out of the law of Moses, and out of the prophets, from morning till evening.” (Acts 28:23) “And Paul dwelt two whole years in his own hired house, and received all that came in unto him, Preaching the kingdom of God, and teaching those things which concern the Lord Jesus Christ, with all confidence, no man forbidding him.” (Acts 28:30-31) So, from the discussion here in Acts and Galatians the underlying problem had to do with the message. Various individuals, apparently, began deviating from the message first delivered to the church. The message from the beginning was what Jesus brought to this earth. “Now after that John was put in prison, Jesus came into Galilee preaching the gospel of the Kingdom of God… repent ye and believe the gospel.” (Mark 1:14) “And Jesus went about all Galilee teaching in their synagogues and preaching the gospel of the kingdom” (Mat. 4:23) The Greek word for ‘gospel’ is ‘euaggelion‘ and is used 76 times in the new testament. From the Eerdman’s Bible Dictionary the meaning for the word ‘gospel’ is good news. The word ‘euaggelizo‘ appears to be the verb form of the word which means ‘preach the gospel or bring glad tidings’. (Young’s Analytical Concordance to the Bible) Another clue of what went wrong with the first church era was that they ‘left their first love.’ Notice what Jesus said of them in Revelation 2:1-5. “Unto the angel of the church of Ephesus write; These things saith he that holdeth the seven stars in his right hand, who walketh in the midst of the seven golden candlesticks I know your works and your labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them liars: And hast borne, and hast patience, and for my name’s sake hast laboured, and hast not fainted. Nevertheless, I have somewhat against thee, because thou hast left thy first love. Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first works; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will remove thy candlestick out of his place except thou repent…” So, what was their ‘first love’ and what were the works they were involved in? The word ‘first’ comes from the Greek word ‘protos‘ meaning foremost. The word ‘love’ comes from the Greek word ‘Agape‘ meaning an outgoing concern for something or someone. Eerdman’s Bible dictionary describes it this way. “In its basic sense the Greek word designates the divine, selfless love which will go to any length to attain the well-being of its object. Apparently, ‘Agape‘ is the highest form of the word love. It is the same word for ‘charity’ in 1 Corinthians 13. In short it is the highest, most exalted fruit of God’s spirit. (1 Cor. 13:13) It is the first one listed in the nine fruits of God’s spirit of Galatians 5:22. So, whatever this ‘love‘ was, it was what they left off doing. So again, what was this love and why did they cease from doing it? To find out we need to back up to when the church first started. The First Century Church In Acts 4:32-37 it describes how people sold their property and gave freely of their possessions. Think about it. These people were so excited, so stirred to action, so motivated by the witness of the apostles and the resurrection of Jesus that they would go to any length to give out this good news and see that the needs of each other were met. So, what was it that drove them, gave them such zeal to do what they did? The church was taking off with great power and causing quite a stir, especially among the leaders at that time. Religious leaders especially began to see their power base slipping. They were, no doubt, quite angry and frustrated, but no matter what the consequences, these new converts were not deterred. Nothing was going to stand in their way… nothing. Many of these same folks, at that time were a ‘living sacrifice’ (Rom. 12:1) They really did fit the definition of ‘agape love’. They would go to any length to attain the wellbeing of its object. It becomes quite evident these folks had a vision of something that gave them great hope. In addition to the miracles they saw, they also remembered Jesus’ teaching about the kingdom of God. For example, they may have remembered parables of certain ones given the opportunity for rulership. The parable of the ‘pounds’ showed how many cities certain ones would be given based on their efforts. The word city comes from the Greek word ‘polis‘. It is used 159 times in the new testament and has no other meaning but that of a city. In the beginning their eyes were focused on that future time and the promises Jesus talked of. Everything else was secondary. Notice Mark 10:29-30… “And Jesus answered and said, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children or lands, for my sake, and the gospel’s, But he shall receive an hundredfold now in this time, houses, and brethren, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and lands, with persecutions; and in the world to come eternal life. This message that Jesus talked about had substance. It was not a ‘pie in the sky’ thing. It was real. The people, who heard him speak, saw themselves in that kingdom. It is very likely they also thought it would happen in their lifetimes, or very shortly thereafter. So, when Jesus did not return when they expected him, what happened? The word’s written to the Galatians, mentioned above, were penned about 55 A.D., which was about 24 years after Christ’s resurrection and the beginning of the New Testament church. It was then that they were turning to another gospel. So, 24 years later people began to change – why? People began to doubt and lose hope. Most of all though, it was because they lost their focus of the original message of God’s kingdom and the world tomorrow. Paul mentions in Galatians 1:7 that “there be some that trouble you and would pervert the gospel of Christ.” This was the real crux of the matter. It was the thing that began to undermine their zeal. They began to lose sight of that future, that wonderful world tomorrow when God’s kingdom would usher in a time of peace and prosperity for all, including their own reward in that kingdom. They began to talk less and less of that future and focused more on their own time and circumstances. Consequently, their love for this message, and even each other began to wane. They began to say, “what’s the use!” They began to give up this hope. As we read carefully through the scriptures, we can begin to see certain dissension concerning who the people would follow. Notice 1 Corinthians 1:11. Paul was exhorting them to stay united with the message… stay focused and not get hung up on who was their favorite leader. Some liked Apollos. Some liked Peter. And, no doubt, there were others who were gaining a following. As time marched on the original message of God’s kingdom continued to dim. Paul’s life was about to end, and he tells Timothy, “For I am now ready to be offered, and the time of my departure is at hand.” (2 Tim 4:6) So he gave instruction to him to continue to focus in on the preaching of God’s kingdom, and to be ready for the time when Jesus would return. For he says the time was coming when people “shall turn their ears away from the truth and shall be turned unto fables:” (2 Tim. 4:4) It’s very likely at the close of the 1st century the love they once had, so slipped, so faded, that instead of being a living sacrifice to each other, many would betray one another. In Matthew 24:10 Jesus is painting the picture of the end time events. When persecution really begins in earnest He says, “And then shall many be offended and shall betray one another and shall hate one another”. It is very likely these words were played out, at least to some degree, in the 1st century. Paul knew this was going to happen and the longer the time passed from Jesus’ resurrection, memories of events faded as eyewitnesses continued to die off. Soon no one would be alive to remember. Their love for the message of God’s Kingdom continued to slip. It is a matter of record now. We can read about it and wonder why? Why did it happen? What could have prevented it from happening? No doubt persecution also played a part in their zeal to remain faithful. So, the church began to compromise on many things to the point where it (the visible church) was unrecognizable from the original. Much more could be written. Much more can be studied about what happened to the church of the 1st century A.D. but let us fast forward to the church age of the 20th century to see if there are any parallels between the two church ages. The 20th Century Church My first encounter with the church, more specifically the Worldwide Church of God, was in 1966. At that time, a friend of mine gave me a stack of Plain Truth magazines. These caught my interest as they seemed to give some practicality to the Bible. It was far different than what I was acquainted with in my protestant background. Shortly thereafter, I began listening to a radio broadcast called ‘The World Tomorrow’. The very title and its introduction each time, set the stage for what would be spoken on the program. “The World Tomorrow…” Immediately these words stirred my imagination. What was he about to say? What would be the message? Would it be a doomsday message, or a message of hope? At that time, we were in the tumultuous 60’s and the Vietnam War was raging. There were conflicts, both at home and abroad. If ever there was a time, we needed to hear a message of hope, it was then. We were sick of war and what was happening to our nation. It seemed like we were being torn apart. Many of us began to ponder questions like, why war? Why does man always try to use war to settle matters rather than peaceful negotiations? Why can’t nations find a better way? On the home front, why all the broken homes, along with all the other social unrest? Why shouldn’t we have peace? If only we could put away our human tendencies for ‘anger‘, for selfish ambition at the expense of our neighbor. If only we could treat our neighbor the same way as we would want to be treated, we could have peace. This world could be utopian. People could be extremely happy. If only… If only… Then, the larger questions began to form. Was there a purpose for man? Was there really a God? If so, why does he permit war… this wretchedness. Why the empty lives? Many people, we could see, seemed to have no answers. What was the meaning of it all? As we continued to listen to the ‘World Tomorrow’ broadcast, we began to see some answers put forward as solutions to man’s dilemma. The voice of this program claimed the answers have been there all along. It is just that the world has been deceived. So, this is what was drawing us, This is what was holding our attention. It was this message. But were they just empty words? Could it really be true? Was it possible for a utopian world? This voice not only said it was possible, but that it was going to happen. Furthermore, the voice of this radio broadcast claimed this was the message that had been hidden from mankind all these years, but why? As I look back on it now, as we all can, was it not this same message that had been preached by Jesus, Paul, and the other apostles, that was stirring our hearts? We all not only read our magazines but listened intently to the broadcast each day. In addition to that, we could hardly wait until each Sabbath came when we could fellowship with people who also had this newfound interest. The following is a sampling of one such radio broadcast beginning with the announcer Art Gilmore, who has since died. For those of you who remember, think of the background music also as you listened to these words: Herbert W. Armstrong brings you the plain truth about today’s world news and the prophecies of the World Tomorrow”. “Well greetings friends, this is Herbert W. Armstrong with the good news of the world tomorrow. Yes, it is a wonderful thing that the news is going to be good… tomorrow. There is a reason why it is not good today. And it is not good because we have not made it good. It is not good because human beings do not know the way of peace. We are reaping exactly what we have been sowing. Now there is a way that seems right to a man, the ends thereof are the ways of death. That is the way we have been living. We are living now in a world of chaos growing up into world revolution. We look out over this world and look at the suffering, the unhappiness and the heartache, the empty lives. There is a cause for it all. And we are not going to have a world of peace, a world of real happiness and abundant living, and prosperity for all, until we come to find the way into those things. And we are going to be forced to learn that way and in our time and in our generation…” Try to recapture the dynamics and intensity of Herbert Armstrong‘s presentation! But more than that, were the words true? Were they believable? If they were believable then, are they still believable today? First off, he says it is a wonderful thing that the news is going to be good… tomorrow. Meaning at some indeterminate time a new world order is coming. Is that statement true? Well, it depends on who you talk to. Those who believe in the Bible as God’s word can see that new world order described through the pages of Isaiah and elsewhere. The Bible plainly says that there is a time coming when all people will know God from the least to the greatest, as the waters cover the sea. (Isaiah 11:9) There’s a time coming when all people will learn how to have peace with his neighbor. Do they know it now? It is obvious they don’t as we think of wars in the Middle East, Yugoslavia and elsewhere. So, this message rang out over the airwaves loud and clear that there is a new world coming. One where there will be universal peace. One where even the vicious wild animals will be at peace with mankind. (Isaiah 11:6-10) How wonderful! How tremendous! This was a message like we never envisioned growing up in the Protestant or Catholic backgrounds. On and on the Bible explains this in various places. Herbert W. Armstrong hit us with this good news (gospel) right up front on most every radio broadcast he ever did. It was the heart and core of the gospel message that Jesus preached. It was the same message Paul and the rest of the apostles preached. It was the message of the hope of God’s kingdom and the world tomorrow. Listening to Herbert Armstrong and following along in our Bibles we believed a new utopian era was about to dawn upon us. We were so inspired by this prospect that we wanted to be a part of it. We saw ourselves as being in that new world. Furthermore, we saw the proof in our own Bibles. If we could prove that God exists, and if He really did inspire this book, the Bible…? Herbert Armstrong made this message come alive. It had been almost dead, it seems, for these 19 millennia, and now it was alive again. As we listened and pondered, we were gripped with excitement. It made sense. We began to understand how the world was deceived. (Rev. 12:9) It seemed only a very few people understood these timeless truths. Why could we envision this new world, and why did these things make sense to us and not to most people? We felt drawn to the message. It was different all right. And we were following right on as he read the words out of the pages of our Bibles. But going on, Herbert Armstrong said today’s world is a world of our making and the way of peace we just do not know. He stated that there is a cause for all the suffering and heartache today. Was he accurate about that? I think it is every bit as accurate today as it was then. Aren’t many, if not most of our problems, self-inflicted? And aren’t most of our problems of a spiritual nature? If we could only get a handle on anger on our selfish desires and turn them around to love our neighbors as ourselves. We could see how a utopian world could happen, but when? The one thing he said oftentimes was that this new world would culminate in our generation. Now that is something that he would not know, nor can anyone know for sure. Although, if we look at Matthew 24 where Jesus is describing the end time events, He says, “So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors. Verily I say unto you, this generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled. (Mat. 24:33-34) The urgency of these words seemed to say, this is happening now. We must be living in the end time. But didn’t Jesus own followers of the 1st Century hear these words and how about every succeeding generation? Maybe each generation has thought, “it can get no worse, we must be living in the time of the end.” There seems to be evidence to prove this to be true. But what makes our generation unique is that no other time in history did the possibility exist for all human life to end with a big bang! Not like our time… What with endless array of war machines and the technology to operate them. With the push of a button, whole cities can now be obliterated. The scenarios of chemical and biological warfare are even more frightening. Conditions for global warfare are continuing to move ever closer. So just when do these words of Matthew take effect. We thought they were true in Herbert Armstrong‘s day, and so did he. But are not conditions more likely today than they were back then? Just think of the computerization of everything since 1986. Surely the words of Daniel 12:1, 4 are more appropriate today than they were 15 years ago. So was it wrong for Herbert Armstrong to lead us to believe we are or were that generation of Matthew 24:34. I think not. But think about these words of Isaiah how he describes this physical world that is coming… Don’t they hit at the heart and core of what involves peoples hopes and dreams? And just how good is technology anyway, if you cannot live in peace to enjoy all the endless gadgets? I think you will have to agree with me, Herbert Armstrong‘s message began in a dynamic way and continued on hitting the nail squarely on the head. The message he talked and wrote about appealed to all of us then, and it is one that should appeal to all of us now. But why all the splits and what happened to this good news. Herbert Armstrong continues… “Now my friends why is it that you have not heard the gospel of Jesus Christ, but a different gospel about his person? A gospel that teaches exactly the opposite of what Jesus Christ did. Why is it that you have been brought up to believe exactly the opposite of what the Bible says? Exactly the opposite of what Jesus Christ taught. Why is it that you have been brought up from childhood practicing customs that are exactly the antithesis of those that Jesus practiced, setting us an example that we should follow his steps, and do as he did. Exactly opposite than the apostle Paul taught to the Gentiles that had been converted Christians.” This was a bombshell! Never had we heard any preacher say such things. Could something like this actually be true? It sounded like a far out claim that for 19 centuries we had “not heard the gospel of Jesus Christ.” It sounded a bit preposterous, even a bit arrogant, for anyone to make this claim. But could it really be true? This was the challenge he put before us. The more we pondered it the more it began to ring true. Whenever had we heard sermons in the churches of our worldly background about the message Jesus preached? Wasn’t it always about his person? We were not ignorant about what Jesus did in giving of His life so that we may live. This was not something we were strange to. But little did we remotely realize or take to heart what He talked about… a God Kingdom, a place in that kingdom, and the physical effects of it on this earth. Think back 20 or 30 years ago. Look at the zeal we all had for this message! Were we any different than the 1st Century church? No, I would say not. We fell in love with this message. We embraced it. We believed it! We began proving it out of our own Bibles. Many people at that time gave generously of their time and substance, just like Acts 4:32-37. Some even sold their farms and moved into town so they could be nearer to the church and other people of like faith. For those that remained far distant, they drove… and drove… Each week they got up early and headed down the road to church, sometimes 200 miles or more, each way! Once at church, they stayed the rest of the day and then turned right around and headed back home, arriving late, just in time to greet the 1st day of the new work week. Sometimes people stayed overnight at church brethren’s homes. These folks were happy to help out as well with meals and other accommodations. This they did week after week, month after month, year after year, in all kinds of weather… for many years! Was this not love? Yes, there was zeal alright. There was love alright… not only for the message, but for one another as well. We were in the process of bonding with each other stronger than we ever had with even our own physical families. Never, would we ever expect to drive this far to hear a speaker, or fellowship with other people. How was it possible? Some extended family members, as well as others who knew what was happening, thought we were crazy! As the months and years passed, we were learning more and more about what the Bible says. We were actually ‘coming out of this world‘. We began to learn about God’s Holy Days verses the counterfeit ones the world observed. Did it cause a stir in families? You bet, and how! Many people lost their jobs because of their desire to observe the Sabbath and not work that day. Many families were broken up. Was it easy living in families where there was a lot of yelling and screaming because of this newfound fanatical religion of Herbert Armstrong‘s? They did not remotely see it as God’s commands. To this day, they do not. But was it easy? No, but it made our determination stronger when we saw the words Jesus spoke. “Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother-in-law. And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household. (Mat. 10:36) No, it was not easy… but we had joy. Life began to have meaning. We saw God’s plan unfolding to us through the Holy Days. We began to see that God’s purpose for creating man was far greater than anyone could have imagined. And it was through this message that we were called and let us be honest about it. The messenger at that time was Herbert W. Armstrong. When Jesus came to this earth, he brought a message of hope, and the 1st century church started out with a fervent love of that message. We can look back and it seems amazing that the whole world, basically, lost sight of His message and followed after a different message… that of his person. It appears that Satan, who is the god of this world, was quite effective in making it seem right, while at the same time diverting mankind’s attention away from the goal… God’s Kingdom. But how much more amazing is it when we contemplate our present era. When we can see how quickly the message has changed again. Can Satan actually use the same tactics and deceive folks just as easily this time as he did in the 1st Century? How Did It Happen? Think back, how many years after Herbert Armstrong‘s death was it that the keynote address at the Feast of Tabernacles was not reflective of that future time and the new world order, but was mainly again about the person of Christ? Was it one year or was it two? The change was gradual but none-the-less, it was changing. The deviation of messages given from headquarters was very slight at first. In fact, it was almost indiscernible. But as time went on it became more and more noticeable in just about everything the church was involved with. Even the hymn books were changed. Why? What was going on? To this writer it seemed someone could not wait until Herbert Armstrong was dead and wasted no time to affect these changes. The ‘World Tomorrow’ telecast, the ‘Plain Truth’ magazine, the booklets, everything began to be refocused. I was in charge of our local church library, and as I recall, nearly every week a new ‘official’ listing was sent out as to what was now to be acceptable church literature. We were told to get rid of many of the reprint articles and booklets as they were no longer valid. What? How could this be? The church appeared to be focusing itself more and more on itself and less and less on giving out the gospel of God’s Kingdom, the message we once embraced and committed ourselves to. In short, the church had taken its eyes off the goal. It had lost its way. Why? Because it had changed the message. It was a conditioning process. It took about 7 years from the time of Herbert Armstrong‘s death to make the complete change over. It started at the time of his death or possibly shortly before, and by July 1992 was complete. Notice the July 27, 1992, Pastor General’s letter to the church. “I call the changes we have made growth, not to obscure the fact that they are changes, but because I believe they are growth! It grieves me that someone can actually feel that the spiritual health of the Church is threatened because we preach Jesus Christ! Jesus says that if any will deny him before men, he will deny them before his Father in heaven. (Matt. 10:33). Jesus Christ, the Son of God who dwelt among us, died for our sins, and was raised from the dead, and sits on the right hand of God as our Intercessor and Ruler, is the focal point of all the Bible. He is the Gospel. He is the kingdom of God. He is the light of the world, the bread of life, and the prince of peace.” There it was! What started out to be a gradual, almost indiscernible leaning in the message, now was in print. The bold statement was made changing the message from what Christ preached to the person of Christ. Doubts began to enter the minds of some. They began to reason… “maybe we’ve been led down a blind alley… maybe the message we had heard was not all we believed… “maybe the world’s churches were not so wrong after all.” Just think of the effect these words had on the church at that time. Whether we realized it or not, saying ‘Jesus is the Gospel’ or that ‘He is the kingdom of God’, made Herbert Armstrong out to be somewhat of a liar. Maybe it was not so bold at that time to make the statement, but his credibility was on the line. Suddenly some began to think Herbert Armstrong was not as truthful as we once thought. “Why, how do we know he didn’t just think up this plan to build his own empire.” Soon all kinds of rumors and allegations began to surface. They did not need to be verified. But the writing was on the wall. From this point on many began to lose heart. Why? Why should this appear strange as happening? The Bible is quite explicit about certain things like this, but for some strange reason, we never thought any error could emanate from headquarters. Why that was ‘holy ground’, or so we thought. But somehow, we seemed to forget the words Herbert Armstrong drilled into us that we should not believe him or anyone else simply because they said it… “prove it from your own Bible.” Somehow or other we had forgotten the words of Paul as shown before that men would rise up “of your own selves… speaking perverse things.” (Acts 20:30) When we think of the word ‘perverse’, we generally think of something totally immoral or dirty. It carries with it that type of connotation. We say things like, “he’s a pervert…” meaning a total deviate or shameful person. The Greek word for ‘perverse’ here is ‘diastre‘, which means “to turn diversely”. (Young’s Concordance) In Galatians 1:7 Paul says, “there be some that trouble you and would pervert the gospel of Christ.” The Greek word here is ‘metastrepho‘. It simply means “to turn”. So, there you have it. The word in the Greek does not necessarily carry with it an evil or immoral connotation, except as maybe in the context of how it is used. It simply means to divert from going in one direction to that of going in another. It does not even mean something totally opposite either. It can mean a very slight change. But what were the words of Paul? What did he tell them to do? He says, “But though we or an angel from heaven preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.” Here, even Paul recognizes that it would be possible for an ‘apostle’ to begin teaching something different. Didn’t we know that? Yes, many did. And from that time forward many began to withhold tithes and offerings. The interest, the enthusiasm people once had suddenly began to wane. The change in the message seemed to have a direct connection with the financial health of the church. Notice the August 25, 1994, Pastor General’s letter. “Income seems stable at about 7 percent below last year… The unpleasant news I bring to you now is that our projections for next year must again anticipate a decline.” By March 27, 1995, the income had suffered severely. Layoffs were now imminent. “Last month I shared with you my sadness about having to terminate hundreds of church employees due to a 30 percent decline in income“… How quickly the church had gone from growing, to a steady decline, and splitting up. Could it have been the same as what happened to the 1st church age? Again, the words of Revelation 2:5. “Never-the-less I have somewhat against you because you have left your first love. Remember therefore from whence you art fallen, and repent and do the first works or else I will come unto you quickly and remove your candle stick out of his place, except you repent“… Had the candle stick been removed ‘out of his place’? Had God removed his blessing from the church? Did the church of the 20th century rewrite the same history of the 1st century? Did we lose our first love? Did we substitute something else for the love we once had for that message? Conclusion Throughout the 50 years from the mid-30’s to the mid-80’s the message Herbert Armstrong reintroduced to this world was that of God’s kingdom and the world tomorrow. This was far different from what the churches of this world, even those claiming to be Christian, taught. Throughout that time also, he pointed out that the real god of this world is Satan and that this message struck at the very heart of what he has deceived the nations about. Since Herbert Armstrong‘s death in 1986, many articles and books have been written condemning him and the Worldwide Church of God. But let us stand back and really think about it. Who taught us to really open up our Bibles and let it be that which we believe? He was the one who really showed us God’s Holy Days verses the days this society observes. As a result of his persistent efforts over those years we have come to really see some things we never knew before. Things which the so-called Christian churches never taught us. We have come to see God’s plan for mankind in his holy days and by observing them we had come to understand these truths more fully. We have come to see God’s plan offers life to all and that he has a timetable to deal with it. These things we came to see by observing the true holy days. In short, we’ve come to understand the truth of the Bible is far more fantastic and exciting than we ever thought before. We began to see the Old Testament and New Testament as one. The message of the Old Testament is basically that of the same Christ and the apostles preached in the new. The Old Testament writers talked about rebuilding the ‘old waste places, deserts ‘blossoming as a rose’, and people living long, abundant and satisfying lives.’ There are hints of a resurrection and eternal life also in the Old Testament when you consider some things written in Job, the Psalms and elsewhere. Chapter 11 of Hebrews talks of God giving many promises to the forefathers of old, which have never been fulfilled in their day. But the time is coming when they will be. How close are we to that day? In one sense we are 15 years closer than when Herbert Armstrong died. In another sense we are as close as our next breath because we do not know when that next one is that will be our last. Yes, it is true, the true gospel has not changed, but some have tried to ‘pervert’ it or change it in some way. The god of this world would have us get our eyes off that future hope and stop growing, stop being excited about it. We must not let that happen. For many of us it was a hard-fought battle at first to commit ourselves. It was like Matthew 13:46 finding that ‘pearl of great price’. Once we found it, we sold all and bought it. Why now do we want our money back. Has the ‘pearl’ lost its value? No. Of course not! Again, there are many voices out there who would have you believe all the effort and sacrifice you gave, by believing the gospel message was in vain. But let us clearly understand what the Bible says is vain and what is not. In Matthew 15:9 and Mark 7:7 Jesus said, “In vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.” Jesus clearly says it is possible to worship him and do it all in vain. Until Herbert Armstrong came along, I did not know that this world’s religions are following doctrines and practices that are not commanded in the Bible. When talking about Christmas, notice what it says in Jeremiah 10:3. “For the customs of the people are vain… To the contrary learning what we did in the Worldwide Church of God, while Herbert Armstrong was alive…, what God says we ought to observe, is not in vain. But many folks are going about saying it was all for nothing…. wasted time and effort. But look what God thinks of that kind of talk. “Your words have been stout (hard, severe) against me, saith the Lord. Yet ye say, what have we spoken much against thee? Ye have said, it is vain to serve God: and what profit is it that we have kept his ordinance…” Mal.3:13-14 What good was it to keep the “Feast” days? Yes, many voices out there are telling you it was foolish for you to travel each Sabbath 200 miles to observe it, listening to messages promoting the true observances. Many are saying we wasted our substance by tithing… spending all that money to promote the true gospel. They are saying it was utterly futile to support a building program for Ambassador College, which was to be a showcase to the world promoting true values. The words telling you these things God says are hard, severe against him. If we begin to have regrets about everything, we’ve ever learned about what’s true and what isn’t, that is the real tragedy! But if we go on and so continue to fear God in the proper way by observing His Holy Days, striving to keep the commands he tells us, striving to overcome our own human natures, he says it is worth it. He says, “Then they that feared the Lord spake often one to another: and the Lord hearkened and heard it, and a book of remembrance was written before him for them that feared the Lord, and that thought on his name. And they shall be mine, saith the Lord of hosts, in that day when I make up my jewels (special treasure) and I will spare them, as a man that spareth his own son that serveth him. Then shall ye return, and discern between the righteous and the wicked, between him that serveth God and him that serveth him not. Furthermore, is God forgetful to forget your prior service? Just because the ‘church’ is presently scattered, does not mean he’s forgotten you or the commitments and love you displayed toward Him or the other members you fellowshipped with in the past. “For God is not unrighteous to forget your work and labour of love, which ye have shewed toward his name, in that ye have ministered to the saints, and do minister.” (Heb 6:10) So, take heart, God says there’s a time coming when we will know just who’s who. He says it is not in vain to observe His Holy Days or that we have tithed and sacrificed in other ways. Quite the contrary… there is great reward… Rather, let us look back on those times in the past when we had joy in fellowship concerning the big questions of our existence and that of the future… our lives and the hope of all mankind… the true gospel message…the kingdom of God. Let us remember our First Love. (This article has been updated and re-printed from “The Church of God Messenger” September/October 2001—Issue No. 5.) |
Iron Sharpening Iron In regard to: First Love Article by Arlan Weight Comments by Darwin Lee (Bismarck, North Dakota) |
---|
In reviewing Arlan Weight’s article on “First Love”, (I will skip the use of “this writer” sounds so “scholarly”). I would concur that he is primarily right on the focus of “what is the true gospel”? However, I do believe there is more than one gospel as was noted, means “good news”. There is the gospel (“good news”) of circumcision/uncircumcision. · Galatians 2:7 (KJV) But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel (good news) of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter… · Galatians 2:14 (KJV) But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said unto Peter before them all, If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews? Also Gal. 2:2 and verse 5 are in context with the above scriptures. You see, that to a gentile coming into the truth of the gospel, being told by Paul they do not need to be circumcised would indeed be good news to them saving all that pain attributed to being circumcised. As for the Jews the gospel of circumcision was good news to them, for they were God’s chosen ones. When you learned you were/are one of God’s chosen, was that not good news to you? There is the gospel of salvation, · Ephesians 1:13 (KJV) In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel (good news) of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise… · Ephesians 3:6 (KJV) That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel: · 2 Timothy 1:10 (KJV) But is now made manifest by the appearing of our Saviour Jesus Christ, who hath abolished death, and hath brought life and immortality to light through the gospel: · 2 Timothy 2:8 (KJV) Remember that Jesus Christ of the seed of David was raised from the dead according to my gospel: · Romans 16:25 (KJV) Now to him that is of power to stablish you according to my gospel and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began, Here the cross of Christ is the (a) gospel, · 1 Corinthians 1:17 (KJV) For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect. The context of this verse is “the cross of Christ”. Why wouldn’t the cross of Christ be a gospel of good news? There is the gospel (good news) of, (dare I say it) grace. · Philippians 1:7 (KJV) Even as it is meet for me to think this of you all, because I have you in my heart; inasmuch as both in my bonds, and in the defense and confirmation of the gospel, ye all are partakers of my grace. · Acts 20:24 (KJV) But none of these things move me, neither count I my life dear unto myself, so that I might finish my course with joy, and the ministry, which I have received of the Lord Jesus, to testify the gospel of the grace of God. There is the gospel to be obeyed. · 2 Thessalonians 1:8 (KJV “In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ” … How does one obey a gospel? · 1 Peter 4:17 (KJV) For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God? To summarize, I believe if one were to be honest there is more than one gospel/good news. The announcement of Christ’s first coming was indeed good news, which was that He would be the savior of mankind through the cross. That to me is really, really exceptionally good news. Paying for our incurred death penalty in our stead by Christ giving up His eternal existence, dead, death which is final, but for the fact that Christ knew that His Father would resurrect him back to life again. But the fact is He was dead for real, for three days and three nights. Can you grasp that? That God gave up his eternal self-existent life for you and all men and women. He created all flesh and humbled Himself to the death of the cross. Now I ask you once more, is that GOOD NEWS or what? Mainstream Christianity for the most part preaches/teaches that. · John 3:16 (KJV) For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. Is that scripture true or not? Let all admit that is good news that even I learned from these “false” churches, one of which I was privy to be schooled in. Yes, I do not say that “tongue and check”, I mean I could have been taught the way of an atheist who believes there is no God. At least I had some teaching of the truth of God. Not everything that the church I was schooled in was a lie/false. Even the Catholic clergy teaches that abortion is murder. Do we, Church of God not even give them credit for that. God will help them someday to see the rest of the truth, just like you and me, bit by bit as they study God’s word all in due time. Let us have the proper attitude of them, for you were, in most cases part of them. We do not give in to the false teachings they have, neither should we look on them with disdain for God is not working with them at this time for the most part as a whole. That is/was the message of the good news of Christ’s first coming. · Matthew 1:21 (KJV) And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins. Again, is not that good news also? As before mentioned, yes, primarily most scriptures that mention “the gospel”, pertain to the gospel of His Kingship on earth and transformation of it from death and destruction to peace and plenty for all with the good news that they too, all in due time will hear the good news that Christ died for them too and paid for their death penalty in their stead. Consider this, when Christ is King, sitting on His throne in Jerusalem, people will be living the “good news” under His rule. Is that all they will have for good news? Is that enough good news for them? They are living the promise of a better kingdom, what more is there? How about the preaching to them as well the good news that they too have forgiveness of sin, (grace) death penalty paid for by the now King in Jerusalem. In conclusion, the gospel of Jesus’s person and what he did for us at His first coming must not be dismissed because mainstream Christianity had a different gospel. When Paul said, · Galatians 1:6 (KJV) I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel” …, that other gospel could not have been the gospel Arlan was talking about, that of the kingdom to come, for he himself says, “mainstream Christianity” never preached that gospel. So, what other gospel was Paul referring to? It certainly was not the gospel of the Kingdom of God to come. So just what was it? An in-depth study will reveal what that gospel primarily was. · Galatians 1:6 (KJV) I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: · 2 Thessalonians 2:7 (KJV) For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. · Romans 6:1 (KJV) What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? · Romans 6:15 (KJV) “What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid”. In general, Christian churches teach the law has been done away with, “nailed to the cross”. That is teaching lawlessness and is perverting the doctrine of the gospel of grace and not to worry so much if you sin, grace is what saves you. They fail in general, to teach and remind the Christian that Christ said, · Matthew 19:17 (KJV) And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments. · John 14:15 (KJV) If ye love me, keep my commandments. They teach the commandments are done away with. · Matthew 5:17 (KJV) Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. Jesus did not just preach the gospel of the kingdom of God, He taught that we needed to keep his laws here and now, “not manana”. The gospel that Paul said was another gospel than what he preached was perverted. License to sin. To the unconverted that indeed was/is “good news”. I witnessed many former members pan a sigh of relief when they were told, you are no longer under the law and that there would no longer be any need for them to keep certain laws like the Sabbath and Holy Days. Some said to me personally that driving all those miles to be at Sabbath gatherings was a burden. How reminiscent of our Old Testament forefathers in all their moaning’s of God’s harsh laws! To the Christian God calls, he/she considers God’s laws, holy, just, and good even as Paul stated. Paul stressed the gospel of Christ crucified and Christ’s saving grace the purpose of Christ’s first coming. Christ stressed the gospel of the purpose of his coming again to usher in his Kingdom. The gospel of Christ’s saving grace through the cross should not be diminished by preaching only the gospel of His second coming just because it was not preached by so called Christianity. Yes, Arlan did say, “We were not ignorant about what Jesus did in giving His life so that we may live. This was not something we were strange to.” (Page 11, paragraph two, line 5 & 6, The “New’ Church of God Messenger, May 22, 2021- Issue No. 16). The main reason it was not strange to most of those God called out of those “so called Christian churches”, is that that is where we were taught about the gospel of Christ’s saving grace by the cross, although it was perverted, but the basic truth of why the cross, was taught. That is Christ died on the cross, shed his blood to save us from paying our own death penalty. · 1 Corinthians 1:23 (KJV) But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness; · 1 Corinthians 2:2 (KJV) For I determined not to know anything among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified. |
Iron Sharpening Iron In regard to: First Love Article by Arlan Weight Comments by Ray Daly (Lincoln, North Dakota) |
---|
Darwin has a good response to the “First Love” article. Just one thing. He mentions that Jesus, when he returns, will sit on his “throne in Jerusalem”. Actually, he will sit on his “throne in Zion”. Few seem to know that Solomon built “two temples”. One using the blueprints of his father David, which he built for him into the side of the hill/mount of Zion. It took seven years. Then he spent thirteen years building his own temple in Jerusalem. The point is, that Zion is in the territory of Judah, and borders on the territory of Jerusalem, which is within the tribe of Benjamin. It’s a long story. But in 585 BC, Solomon’s temple in Jerusalem was totally destroyed. But David’s temple in Zion was not. Only it was “robbed” of its gold vessels. Which included the table of bread and the lampstand. As well, he totally took the gold and silver vessels from Jerusalem’s temple. Later all were returned. As it reads, they were told to put those of Zion in the temple which is “at” Jerusalem, while those of Solomon’s temple it is said to put them into the (new) temple “in” Jerusalem. People will not accept it readily, but the fact is that the Zion Temple was there until the time of Jesus death. When there was an earthquake and the “house” built around the Zion Temple fell down covering up said temple. (It was built on the measurements of the Tent of Meeting Israel had in the wilderness. And had two 45′ walls on either side, which protected it when the 1st century earthquake happened. Prophecy shows that in the future, before the Son of Man returns, another earthquake in Jerusalem will take place, in which said temple will be uncovered. This is shown by the “man of sin sitting in the temple of God saying that he is God.” (para.) It also says that when the Son of Man comes, the temple will be cleaned, and then he shall “sit on his throne”. Take note. Only the Ten Commandment Law is in that room. Not the book of the law, which was kept in the outer room. The above may be hard to accept??? Editor’s Note: Does anyone have more information in regard to Solomon building two temples. If so, please send it. Laura Lee |
Iron Sharpening Iron In regard to: First Love Article by Arlan Weight Comments by Ray Daly (Lincoln, North Dakota) |
---|
Thanks for printing the comments on there being two temples built by Solomon. The one point to be sure to consider is, that the temple in Jerusalem which Jesus spent time in teaching, was very large. But the temple built in Zion was “very small”. Only the size of the Tent of Meeting. 30′ Wide, by 90′ Long, by 30′ High. Editor’s Note: Does anyone besides Ray know anything about Solomon having built two temples? If so, please send evidence. Thank you, Laura Lee |
Views: 4
Sign up to Receive [The "New" Church of God Messenger] weekly newsletter: